On Thursday, the S&P 500 suffered its largest decline since early July – and its six in seven sessions – with a loss of 2.6%. Breadth and volume ratios were so negatively lopsided that it was a 9:1 day.
In yesterday’s post we resolved a conflict between the hourly charts of the DJIA and S&P by effectively resolving the conflict in favor of the DJIA, suggesting that the S&P may still need to undercut the 9/25 low with a “C” wave to bring it in line with the DJIA. Thursday’s sell-off did allow the S&P to “catch up” by carrying the index below the 9/25 low and locking in the rally from the 9/2 low as a complete pattern.
The hourly chart suggests that the decline from the 9/23 high is corrective, but we will wait for the daily chart to confirm. That said, the post-July uptrend line has been violated and deteriorating near term momentum is still on the overbought side of neutral (even though the daily Coppock Curve has a bearish bias for 23 of the 24 industry groups have). So, still lower lows are likely. The index is probing the 1036-1015 support range, but it will still take a decline through 992-991 to lock in the July-September rally as a complete Elliott Wave pattern. The July low (869) continues to be tactical support. First resistance has been lowered slightly to 1070-1080. Second resistance is 1121-1156.
For the record, we do not consider this decline to be the beginning of a major decline. We continiue to believe that near to medium term decline are corrections within, but not reversals of, the post-March bear market rally.
10-Year Yields
While the S&P was under pressure, so were 10-year yields. We have long focused on 3.30%-3.29% as an important support point and suggested that the decline from the August highs should at least challenge 3.17% (a 38.2% retracement of the December-August rally). On Thursday, 3.29% was violated and – almost in an instant – accelerated to 3.19%. The 3.17%-3.11% range is now support. Prior support at 3.30%-3.29% is now important resistance. We continue to respect the possibility that the December low is an historic benchmark.
No comments:
Post a Comment