Wednesday, March 17, 2010
New Public Blog Post
Non-subscribers will be directed to a new Market Pulse blog page that will be updated approximately once a week on our website. A new Market Pulse was posted a few hours ago (http://wminsights.com/Commentary/PublicBlog.aspx). A notice to that effect has been posted on Twitter at http://twitter.com/waltergmurphy.
The chart below is from that blog.
Those interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
We Have Moved
Non-subscribers will be directed to a new Market Pulse blog page that will be updated approximately once a week on our website. A new Market Pulse has been posted.
Those interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter at http://twitter.com/waltergmurphy.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
We Have Moved
Non-subscribers will be directed to a new Market Pulse blog page that will be updated approximately once a week on our website. Those interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter at http://twitter.com/waltergmurphy.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
“Xs” Marks the Spot
It looks like tomorrow will be the day that our blog finally migrates to the “Comments” section of our website (www.wminsights.com). We have also decided to make the daily blog available only to subscribers, along with Insights and the Short Term Review. Hopefully, this will allow subscribers to avoid fire-wall issues that often interfere with directly accessing a typical blog site. Non-subscribers will be directed to a new Market Pulse blog page that will be updated once a week on our website. Those interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter at http://twitter.com/waltergmurphy.
Errata: in yesterday’s blog we mentioned that, of the 44 trading days so far this year, 47 have been winners based on the S&P. It should have been 27 winners. Apologies for the confusion.
On Tuesday, the S&P 500 managed an intra-day low below Monday’s low; this represented the first lower low since February 25. However, the index managed to finish with a gain of 0.2%. Breadth was positive by a modest 9:8 margin, but the up/down volume ratio was positive by a more robust 2:1 edge. Moreover, total volume increased by a hearty 37%. So it would seem that the day’s internals were more constructive than the S&P’s performance would suggest. The daily Coppock Curve is positive for 12 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
The index remains in the 1131-1150 resistance area created by January’s top formation. By extension, it also remains below the important Fibonacci resistance area that is evident from 1150 to 1159. A breakout would be viewed as a potentially bullish intermediate development and would likely necessitate that we raise tactical support from the current 1029 benchmark.
Nearby support can be found at 1126-1117, then 1112-1104.
S&P 500 with Combined VIX + 10-Year Yields
During the day on Tuesday, we noticed that if we added 10-year yields (using TNX) to the VIX index, the result was an indicator that we feel is a measure of valuation, sentiment, and volatility. It closed last week at a value of 21.10. This compares to the October 2007 reading of 21.55 and May 2008’s 20.32. (For comparison, the 11 year low was 14.50 in July 2005.) By contrast, the 11 year high was 82.82 in October 2008; the March 2009 high was 52.16.
Those are a lot of numbers to digest, but two things are obvious. First, at its current level, this indicator is at post-2007 overbought extremes. Second, within its longer 11-year history, the current reading is in the 90th percentile. While this measure of valuation, sentiment, and volatility will not prevent the current year-long uptrend from going still higher (especially if there is no divergence), it does suggest that the rally is skating on increasingly thin ice.
Monday, March 8, 2010
A Coming Reversion to the Mean?
March’s monthly Insights has been released and is available to subscribers on our website, www.wminsights.com. We also hope to make our blog available to all readers in the Comments section of our website in the next day or two. (Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers.) Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter at http://twitter.com/waltergmurphy.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 fell by only 0.02%, but that was enough to snap a six-day winning streak. Breadth, however, was modestly positive (by a 6:5 margin), as was the up/down volume ratio (by 7:5). Total volume fell by 10% to its lowest level of the year. The daily Coppock Curve is positive for 12 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
The six-day winning streak got us to thinking. Of the 44 trading days so far this year, 27 have been winners (based on the S&P 500). That equates to a winning percentage of 61.4%. For the period 1982- 2009, only one year had a higher percentage – 1995’s 61.9%. The average for all 28 years is 52.9% and the mean for the 21 up years is 54.9%.
S&P Day-to-Day Winning Percentage (1982-2010)
All of this suggests that there is a reasonably good chance that, in the months ahead, the S&P’s performance will be such that 2010’s winning percentage will revert closer to the mean in the low 50% range rather than the current low 60% figure. If so, this would be in line with our expectation – as outlined in January’s Year Ahead piece – that the second half of the year could be a difficult time.
Nearby support can be found at 1126-1117, then 1112-1104.
Resistance is indicated at 1150-1159.
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Points to Ponder
March’s monthly insights has been released and is available to subscribers on our website, www.wminsights.com. We also hope to make our blog available to all readers in the Comments section of our website in the next day or two. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter at http://twitter.com/waltergmurphy.
Friday’s rally carried the S&P solidly into the 1131-1150 resistance area that we have focused on since the breakout above 1116. So the real question is, “What’s next?” There are several points that dominate our thinking.
First, we continue to respect the idea that, while November’s decline can be counted as a reversal of the rally from July’s low, it may have only been a correction within a larger post-July pattern. If so, then the January-February decline locked in the July-January rally as a complete pattern. Thus, the line of demarcation is January’s 1150.45 high; a rally through that benchmark will leave us no choice but to count February’s low as the equivalent of a fourth wave within the still unfolding post-March 2009 corrective pattern. (July’s low was wave 2.) Moreover, a rally through 1150 will also raise tactical support to 1044, from 1029.
Second, while Friday was a solid day in most respects, it was also a low volume day – again. Total volume did increase modestly (4%) from Thursday’s level, but it remains solidly below its 21-day ma. In fact, the 21-day moving average has been declining throughout the entire rally from the March 2009 low. This is in contrast to the 2007-2009 downtrend, when volume consistently increased throughout the bear market.
S&P 500 with NYSE Composite Volume (21-day ma)
Third, absent a solid week this week, we expect that near term momentum will turn down in harmony with a still weak medium term oscillator.
Fourth, the backing and filling in the middle of last week looks very much like a triangle. Conventional triangles are continuation patterns and are also penultimate structures. This combination suggests that Friday’s rally is the final surge from the February 25 low. Combined with the momentum configuration, It would appear that the S&P will soon be in need of a rest.
Fifth, the dominant February-March uptrend line is currently near 1108 and rising by more that three points per day. (The trend line connecting the July and February lows is near 1068.)
Finally, the overall structure remains corrective. Virtually every correction over the past 12 months has overlapped the correction that preceded it. Overlaps are classic signs of a corrective pattern.
All that said, we need to expand the top end of the resistance zone to 1159, from 1150. The 1150 level represents the January high, so that is an obvious resistance point. However, the rally from the July low will equal the prior March-June rally at 1158. Moreover, the rally from the February 25 low will equal the February 5-22 uptrend at 1154. Finally, on the hourly closing chart, the thrust out of the March 2-4 triangle equal the February 25-March 2 rally into the triangle at 1155. So it seems pretty clear that a rally through 1159 will be a bullish development.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Monthly Insights
This month’s Insights has been posted to the website for subscribers. Below is our “Plain English” summary as well as one of the charts from the report:
Stocks: It is highly unlikely that the rally since last March is a new bull market. It may qualify as a bull market by conventional (myopic) standards, but it is structurally a bear market rally.
The Rest of the World: In the months ahead, global markets face the potential for a broad-based correction. In that environment, the S&P 500 is apt to demonstrate relative strength.
10-Year Yields: Yields have been contending with nearby support in the 3.58%-3.54% range. That range represents both a January-February double-bottom and a 50% retracement of the November-December rally. It also represents what has become a test of December’s breakout point. So, this range has become important in its own right. A breach would open the door for a test of the November low. Until that breach occurs, yields could still try to test resistance.
US Dollar: The weekly Coppock Curve has a bearish bias for the dollar versus three of the six currencies in the index and a bullish bias versus the other three (including the euro). However, five of the six are more overbought than not and we expect to see a majority bearish condition to become evident over the course of the next two weeks.
Commodities: Gold is in a multi-year uptrend that has arguably satisfied the minimum requirements for a complete pattern from an Elliott Wave perspective. However, both sentiment and intermediate momentum are positioned to take on a bullish bias in coming weeks. This suggests that gold is nominally positioned for a spring/summer rally (or trading range) prior to what could be a difficult second half. Meanwhile, sentiment for the energy complex in general and oil in particular is more overbought (excessively optimistic) than not. Moreover, sentiment (which is a trend following indicator) did not confirm January’s high. So, as is the case with momentum, there is a divergence. Thus, it is not a stretch to suggest that the “B” wave rally has seen its internal peak.
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Tick Tock
We still hope to make our blog available to all readers in the Comments section of our website, www.wminsights.com by the end of this week. Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 rallied by less than 0.1% but that was still enough to post its its fourth straight gain. Breadth was positive by 5:4 and up volume was better than down volume by a 4:3 margin. Total volume fell by 7% and remains below its 21-day ma. The daily Coppock Curve is positive for 20 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
The bottom line is that Wednesday was essentially a non event. As a result, we are watching both the momentum background, which is beginning to deteriorate, and the uptrend line from the February 5 low, which is crossing through the 1102 area. A confirmed reversal in momentum, coupled with a breach of the trend line, would do much to confirm that a short term top is in place and that the intermediate pressures are reasserting themselves. The implications would be for at least a test of 1044.
Nearby support is at 1112-1105 then 1086 and the 1078-1075 breakout point. We still regard 1029-1020 as tactical support but, if the S&P rallies directly through 1150, we will have to consider raising tactical support to the recent 1044 low.
As for resistance, our focus is on the 1131-1150 range.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Time is Running Short
We still hope to make our blog available to all readers in the Comments section of our website, www.wminsights.com by the end of this week. Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Tuesday, the S&P 500 posted its third straight gain with a rally of 0.2%. Breadth was positive by 7:3 and up volume was better than down volume by an 8:5 margin. Total volume finally increased (by 9%) on an up day, but remains below its 21-day ma.
The daily Coppock Curve is positive for 23 of the 24 S&P industry groups. While that is a large majority, it broke a string of four straight days (and six out of seven) where the oscillator had a bullish bias for all 24 groups. It seems likely that, failing a very strong day, Wednesday will see more noticeable group deterioration. Indeed, by the end of the week, the Coppock Curve could well have a bearish bias for a majority of the groups.
S&P with Daily and Weekly Coppock Curves
We have been making the case that medium term momentum (i.e., the weekly Coppock Curve), which has been deteriorating, would likely withstand the bullish pressures being exerted by the short term rally from the early February low. With a short term momentum peak seemingly virtually at hand, it appears that the weekly oscillator has, in fact, maintained its bearish bias. Indeed, it is positioned to remain weak for another 5-8 weeks. So it does appear that the weeks immediately ahead could prove to be weaker – perhaps much weaker – than the past few weeks.
In a similar vein, it is worth noting that this is the 17th week since the last 20-week cycle low in November. Since the February low was only 13 weeks into this new cycle, it is unlikely that it was a 20-week cycle low. If it was, it would be the shortest cycle since the peak in 2000. Since late 2004, early 2005 this cycle has averaged 20 weeks, and the normal “window” for a low has been on the order of 17-24 weeks. Since the last four cycles have been below average in duration, it would seem that we are overdue for an above-average – or at least an average – cycle. Thus, a cycle low may not occur for another 3-7 weeks. That puts the cycle environment in reasonable harmony with the perceived momentum background. Together they suggest that we continue to be alert for a test of the February low.
Tuesday’s rally confirmed Monday’s breakout through 110-1116. This suggests that, in the time left to it, the rally still has the potential to challenge the 1131-1150 range.
Nearby support is at 1112-1105 then 1086 and the 1078-1075 breakout point. We still regard 1029-1020 as tactical support but, if the S&P rallies directly through 1150, we will have to consider raising tactical support to the recent 1044 low.
Monday, March 1, 2010
Internal Peak
We still hope to make our blog available to all readers in the Comments section of our website, www.wminsights.com by the end of this week. Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Monday, the S&P 500 rallied 1.0%. Breadth was positive by almost 11:2 and the up volume was better than down volume by almost 4:1. However, total volume fell 9% to its second lowest level of the year. It is interesting to note that, of the 39 trading days year to date, 23 have posted a gain, but 13 of those have occurred on lower volume. That low volume pace has increased of late – five of the past seven up days were on lower day-to-day volume.
Meanwhile the daily Coppock Curve still has a bullish bias for all 24 S&P 500 industry groups. That said, it still appears to be on track to peak in the early days of March (i.e., this week). Obviously, we will watch that closely in coming day since a coming peak will put the daily oscillator in harmony with the still deteriorating weekly indicator.
In recent posts we have pointed to 1110-1116 as an important resistance area, reflecting the fact that it represents three different Fibonacci and chart relationships. The S&P is now at the top end of that range and, since the rising Coppock may still have a few more days of life left in it, we have to respect the potential for a penetration of that range. If that occurs, it would be at least a short term plus and imply further strength toward 1131-1150.
Even so, Monday’s high was enough to lock in the January-February decline as a complete pattern. On the surface, that decline has a three-wave (counter trend) structure. This, plus the fact that the decline was a 38.2% retracement of the preceding rally from July’s low, leaves open the possibility that this decline is simply a normal pullback within the larger post-March uptrend. However, while the January-February downtrend has been reversed, its three-wave structure has not been locked in; that will require a rally through the January high. Until that happens, it is still possible to count the rally from the February low as a counter trend move within a larger, still unfinished decline from the January high. Thus, until the January high is breached, we will remain alert for at least a test of the February low. We still think that the S&P is positioned to at least test, if not violate, its recent low near 1045. Below Thursday’s low at 1086, next support is indicated at the 1078-1075 breakout point. A breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown. We still regard 1029-1020 as tactical support. However, if the S&P rallies directly through 1150, we will have to consider raising tactical support to the recent 1044 low.
All that said, even if the S&P rallies through its January high, there is the very real possibility that new highs will be met with more and greater divergences than those that already exist. As an example, the Bullish Percentage Index (BPI) peaked in September but recorded a lower high in January. Thus, a case can be made that the market’s internal peak occurred in September. As a result, higher highs by the S&P, accompanied by lower highs in the BPI, are arguably part of an important topping process. This in not unlike the bottoming process that occurred between October 2008 and March 2009. Both the S&P and the BPI made bear market lows in October 2008; the S&P continued to make lower lows in November 2008 and March 2009 while the BPI recorded successive higher highs. The rest, as they say, is history.
This together, together with the momentum configuration, suggests that the 12-month uptrend has moved into its very late stages.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Bending but Not Yet Broken
We are moving! Hopefully by the end of next week our blog will be available to all readers in the Comments section of our website, www.wminsights.com. Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers. Further details will be posted when they become more certain. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
It could have been worse. On Thursday, the S&P 500 finished the day with a loss of 0.2% after having been down as much as 1.7%. Despite a solid afternoon recovery, both breadth and the up/down volume ratio were negative by a 9:8 margin. Total volume expanded by 9% from Wednesday’s total, effectively continuing its recent tendency to increase on down days and decrease on up days. The daily Coppock Curve still has a bullish bias for all 24 S&P industry groups.
Thursday’s action presents us with a bit of a conundrum. The early sell-off violated the support trend line of the channel we showed in yesterday’s post. The afternoon rally then tested, but did not penetrate, that same trend line. As a result, a case can be made that the trend line is now a resistance line. That combination can be considered a negative (i.e., a breakdown then a test of the breakdown point).
However, an hourly low (post-February 9) was accompanied by a decent positive RSI divergence. Moreover, both the hourly and daily Coppock Curves currently have a bullish bias and the 10-day CBOE put/call ratio is more oversold than not. All of this is viewed as a net positive.
While we remain of the opinion that the S&P will at least test, if not penetrate, the early February low (at 1044) before a new intermediate rally takes hold, our sense is that Thursday afternoon’s rally will follow through and try to test the 1110-1116 range yet again. Thus, while the uptrend from the February 5 low is bending, it has not yet been broken.
But, even if 1110-1116 is tested, it will likely be a last gasp. We have made the case that the daily Coppock oscillator would remain positive into the early days of March and March begins next week. Since a near term peak is likely to have negative medium term implications, we have to be alert to the idea that a coming peak – which is probably only days away – will lead to a decline that should last several weeks. So, from an intermediate perspective, the downside risk likely outweighs the upside potential in terms of both price and time.
The aforementioned 1110-1116 resistance range encompasses a 61.8% retracement of the January-February decline, the point at which the “C” wave of the current rally is 1.618 times the “A” wave, and chart resistance generated by the late December low. Clearly, a breach of that range would be at least a short term plus and imply further strength toward 1131-1150.
In the weeks ahead, we still think that the S&P is positioned to at least test, if not violate, its recent low near 1045. Below Thursday’s low at 1086, next support is indicated at the 1078-1075 breakout point. A breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown. Our longer term focus, of course, is on tactical support at 1029-1020.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
It’s Not Over ‘Til It’s Over
We are moving! Hopefully by the end of next week – perhaps sooner – our blog will be available to all readers in the Comments section of our website, www.wminsights.com. Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers. Further details will be posted when they become more certain. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 recovered from Tuesday’s “tail wagging the dog” sell-off with a gain of 1.0%. Breadth was positive by 11:4 and the up/down volume ratio was positive by better than 3:1. Despite the rally, total volume dropped by 8% from Tuesday’s total. The daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for all 24 S&P industry groups.
In the early days of February, we were looking for a short term momentum low and suggested that, when momentum did bottom, the resulting bullish bias could persist for 2-3 weeks. As it happened, the daily Coppock oscillator bottomed 11 days ago and currently appears positioned to remain bullish for another 4-8 days. So it would seem that near term momentum still has some life left in it, but has not been overly powerful.
At the same time, intermediate momentum has been – and still is – positioned to be under pressure into late March/early April. As a result, our ongoing expectation that intermediate pressures will withstand a near term rally still seems valid.
While the rally from the February 5 low may still have some life left in it, the overall pattern has been corrective. For that matter, so does the bounce from Tuesday’s low. This, together with the momentum configuration, suggests that the rally since February 5 will prove to be a counter trend move within a larger decline from January’s high.
With that in mind, the S&P has already challenged – and is struggling with – the 1110-1116 resistance range, which encompasses a 61.8% retracement of the January-February decline, the point at which the “C” wave of the current rally is 1.618 times the “A” wave, and chart resistance generated by the late December low. Clearly, a breach of that range would be at least a short term plus and imply further strength toward 1131-1150.
In the weeks ahead, we still think that the S&P is positioned to at least test, if not violate, its recent low near 1045. However, there is no significant intervening support until the 1078-1075 breakout point. A breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown. Our longer term focus, of course, is on tactical support at 1029-1020.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Bull Trap for Consumer Confidence
We are moving! By the end of next week – hopefully sooner – our blog will be available to all readers in the Comments section of our website, www.wminsights.com. Insights and the Short Term Review will continue to be available only to subscribers. Further details will be posted when they become more certain. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Tuesday, the S&P 500 had its largest decline in almost three weeks with a loss of 1.2%. Breadth was negative by almost 11:2 and the up/down volume ratio was negative by a 6:1 margin. Total volume expanded by 17% from Monday’s total. The daily Coppock Curve still has a bullish bias for 23 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
One of the more common reasons for Tuesday’s rout was a sharp decline in the Conference Board’s index of Consumer Confidence. That reasoning may be a case of the tail wagging the dog. The stock market is a leading economic indicator; consumer confidence is not (though consumer expectations are). So, it is worth noting the nearby chart, which highlights the very close correlation between the S&P 500 and the Consumer Confidence index since the secular stock market peak in 2000. (This close relationship is actually apparent for many years before 2000.) So a case can be made that consumer confidence has been deteriorating because stock prices have begun to deteriorate, not the other way around.
That said, an examination of the Consumer Confidence index’s chart suggests that it just experienced a “bull trap,” which occurs when prices break above important resistance and generate a buy signal, but then reverse course and invalidate the buy signal (for this and other definitions, see the glossary in our website). Thus, from the perspective of technical analysis, the Consumer Confidence index is positioned to work its way lower in the months ahead.
As for the S&P 500, we have already made the case in our Year Ahead piece that the second half of 2010 could see the most important decline since the 2007-2009 sell-off; that, too, might not bode well for consumer confidence.
In the weeks ahead, we still think that the S&P is positioned to at least test, if not violate, its recent low near 1045. The Elliott Wave does not appear to be complete, sentiment is no better than neutral, and medium term momentum is positioned to maintain its current bearish bias for another 7-10 weeks.
There is no significant intervening support until the 1078-1075 breakout point. A breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown. Our longer term focus, of course, is on tactical support at 1029-1020.
Last week’s high challenged the 1110-1116 resistance range, which encompasses a 50% retracement of the January-February decline, the point at which the “C” wave of the current rally is 1.618 times the “A” wave, and chart resistance generated by the late December low. A rally through that range would open the door for further strength toward 1131-1150.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Bond Prices Ready to Rally
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Monday, the S&P 500 broke a four-day winning streak with a loss of 0.1%. Breadth was modestly negative, but the up/down volume ratio was modestly positive. However, total volume continued its recent malaise and fell to its lowest level of the year. The daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for all 24 S&P industry groups.
Meanwhile, the long bond posted its second inside day in a row (with a lower high and a higher low than the previous session). This may be a sign of fatigue. The nearby contract has been in a near term downtrend for much of February and in recent days began testing the late December, early January short term base. While further – and deeper – testing is possible, we would note that the daily Coppock Curve is positioned to bottom by very early March while the weekly oscillator may have bottomed within the past week. Thus, we will be alert to the idea that a near term low in the days immediately ahead will be fuel for an intermediate rally.
With that in mind, we would remind readers that we have regularly made the case that, while we can (and do) count a five wave rally for 10-year yields between December 2008 and August 2009, it is much more difficult to count a similar five wave decline for long bond prices over that same period. A much more “obvious” count is that long bond prices fell in three waves from December 2008 to June 2009, and then rallied on three waves into October 2009. The overall downtrend since then also has a corrective look to it. All of this suggests that a larger structure is incomplete and that a coming rally will also be an inherently corrective pattern.
From a non-Elliott perspective readers may also remember that we have previously shown a possible head-and-shoulder top in the long bond (and a pending head-and shoulders bottom in 10-year yields), which has been unfolding since at least June 2008. If a coming rally proves to be corrective, it will likely be part of the right shoulder, which still appears to be in progress.
That said, key support is in the 113-112 area (with some intervening support near 114:08). A breach of that level would effectively break the multi-year “neckline” and argue for significantly lower level.
Equally important resistance is in the 117:16-123:24 area, though most of the resistance is in the narrower 117:18-121:13 range. That represents the top end of the right shoulder, so a break of that range would weaken the pending H&S pattern.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Don’t Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Thursday, the S&P 500 posted its third straight gain with a rally of 0.7%. Breadth was positive by a 7:3 ratio while up volume was greater than down volume by a bit more than 2:1. However, total volume fell by 9% to its lowest level of the month. The daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for 23 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
The biggest news on Thursday was the S&P’s rally through resistance at 1104-1105. We have been putting some emphasis on that range for a while and, with this breach, the decline from January’s high takes on a distinct corrective (counter trend) look.
We are aware that there are those who count the entire decline from the January high to the February low as a full five-wave sequence. We don’t agree. In our view, the decline from the highs into late January was one pattern, the rally into February 2 was a second pattern, and the subsequent decline into February 5 was the third and final structure. Now that the February 2 high has been violated, a clean three-wave pattern is fairly obvious.
That said, we are not ready to throw the baby out with the bathwater. We still think that intermediate momentum will withstand this near term strength. Moreover, the February 5 low was too early by historical standards to be a 22-week cycle low. Also, the hourly chart shows negative momentum divergences that could be the precursor to divergences on the daily chart in the days ahead. Thus, the risk remains for a move back to or through February’s 1044 low once the current rally runs its course.
Nonetheless, the rally through 1104-1105 (together with still constructive momentum) turns our immediate focus on 1110-1116. That range encompasses a 50% retracement of the January-February decline, the point at which the “C” wave of the current rally is 1.618 times the “A” wave, and chart resistance generated by the late December low. A rally through that range would open the door for further strength toward 1131-1150.
On the downside, there is no significant support until the 1078-1075 breakout point. A breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown. Our longer term focus, of course, is on tactical support at 1029-1020.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Up, Close, and Personal
Our Short Term Review has been released and is available to subscribers on the website. Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to walter@wminsights.com. We are also on Twitter as waltergmurphy.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 gained 0.4%. Breadth was positive by less than a 2:1 ratio while up volume outpaced down volume by a bit more than 2:1. Total volume was marginally better than Tuesday’s turnover, but remains well below its declining 21-day ma. The daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for 23 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
In recent posts we have regularly made the case that 1104-1105 is an important resistance area for the S&P 500. This is because a rally through that resistance will do much to define the decline from January’s high as a corrective pattern.
Moreover, the rally from the February 5 low (which is corrective in its own right) has important internal resistance just above 1100. So, with Wednesday’s high at 1100, the rally is now up, close, and personal with a significant resistance area.
With that in mind, near term momentum is still constructive. Readers may recall that, in an early February post, we suggested that near term momentum was on the verge of bottoming and that a new bullish bias could last for 2-3 weeks. That still seems to be a reasonable scenario. A majority of the 24 S&P groups took on a bullish bias on February 9 and this majority condition is likely to persist into the early days of March.
That said, we continue to believe that the deteriorating medium term indicators will be able to withstand the constructive near term pressures. So, higher rally highs are at risk of creating more negative divergences. Moreover, an early March near term peak will likely have negative medium term implications.
We still believe that the trading range from Monday’s high into Thursday’s high was a “B” wave triangle. If so, this clearly defines the overall rally from last Friday’s low an ABC pattern. As such, the current “C” wave will be 1.618 times the “A” near 1100. As mentioned, key resistance is at 1104-1105.
On the downside, our main focus is on tactical support at 1029-1020. However, the aforementioned “B” wave triangle is important interim support. In that regard, a breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown and do much to indicate the demise of the current rally.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Short Term Review
Stocks: Even if a rally through 1104-1105 were to occur, we do not believe that would change the big picture outlook as described in our January “Year Ahead” piece. We continue to believe that a challenge of the January high would result in more numerous and more important negative divergences than those that already exist. It would be a condition not unlike the divergences that appeared in October 2007 as the market penetrated the July 2007 high.
10-Year Yields: In recent days, yields have rallied through near term resistance at 3.71% and have pierced (at least temporarily) the downtrend line from the December peak. However, a case can be made that this rally is a “C” wave within an ABC rally pattern from the late January low at 3.58%. As such, this rally has only retraced a normal 50%-61.8% of the December-January decline. So, at this point, it is “no harm, no foul.”
US Dollar: The Elliott and momentum evidence suggests that a near term pullback will likely be a pause within the dollar’s current rally trend. However, a more important top may not occur until the intermediate pressures begin to build in March-April.
Commodities: From an Elliott wave perspective, g July lows represent the end of a fourth wave triangle so a reversal would bolster our view that the minimum requirements for a complete multi-year five-wave pattern had been satisfied. From a non-Elliott perspective, the breach of the post-July uptrend line would imply larger uptrends from April 2009 and possibly from late 2006 had also been reversed. All of this raises the prospects that the decline from last December’s high is the opening salvo in a cyclical decline.
S&P 500 Hourly
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Signs of Distribution
On Thursday, the S&P 500 gained 1.0%. Breadth was positive by a bit less than a 6:1 ratio while up volume outpaced down volume by better than 3:1. Total volume was marginally better than Wednesday’s turnover, but remains well below its 21-day ma. The daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for 30 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
S&P with Volume Momentum
In yesterday’s post we said that, while there were mixed signals, we were inclined to look for a bounce rather than a decline. We felt – and still feel – that the corrective rally from last week’s low did not appear to be finished. It is not unreasonable to count the trading range from Monday’s high into Thursday’s high as a “B” wave triangle. If so, this clearly defines the overall rally from last Friday’s low an ABC pattern, with Thursday’s rally viewed as the beginning to the “C” wave. As such, this “C” wave would find Fibonacci and chart resistance in the 1085-1090 area, with second resistance indicated near 1100. Key resistance is at 1104-1105; a rally through that benchmark would do much to lock in the decline from the January 19 peak as a corrective pattern.
On the downside, our main focus is on tactical support at 1029-1020. However, the aforementioned “B” wave triangle is important interim support. In that regard, a breach of 1057 would be viewed as a breakdown and do much to indicate the demise of the current rally.
With all that in mind, volume has lagged badly in recent weeks. Indeed, just as this rally of recent days was beginning to gain some footing, our measure of volume momentum was at levels not seen since March. This followed a distinct negative volume divergence at January’s peak. This divergence, followed by a breakdown to multi-month lows, is viewed as a clear sign of distribution. Given our concerns related to sentiment and intermediate momentum, these volume pressures are further evidence that the recent low near important Fibonacci support at 1043 will be breached in coming weeks.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
A Coin Toss
We will be hosting a webinar/conference call later this month. It would be about an hour and will include both charts and Q&A. The cost will be $30 and there are still some spots available. Please send expressions of serious interest (with no commitment) to walter@wminsights.com.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 fell 0.2%. Breadth was negative by a 4:3 ratio and down volume outpaced up volume by a 5:4 margin. However, total volume fell by 17% and dropped below its 21-day ma. The daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for 20 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
S&P 500 Hourly
Mixed signals abound. On the one hand, near term momentum has a bullish bias as evidenced by the daily Coppock Curve and the 10-day CBOE put/call ratio is oversold. On the other hand, the decline from the January 19 peak is essentially impulsive even as the “rally”: from last Friday’s low is corrective (counter trend) and is bumping up against important downtrend lines. So, in a sense, it is a bit of a flip of a coin as to whether the rally of recent days has more life left in it or whether the January-February downtrend is ready to reassert its dominance. If nothing else, recent action has clearly confirmed the importance of support near our minimum objective of 1043.
All that said, we are inclined to look for a bit of a bounce before the downtrend resumes. While the rally is corrective, it does not appear to be finished. We can make the case that the rally is actually a “C” wave or even a fourth wave. Regardless, it appears to be an ABCDE structure and the final “E” is not complete. A move to or through the hourly downtrend line is still possible.
Whether or not that proves to be the case, we continue to believe that the intermediate pressures will be able to withstand any nearby strength. Thus, whether the current rally lasts for another day or another week, lower lows are likely to follow.
Our resistance focus in the period immediately ahead is still on 1104-1105. A rally through that benchmark would do much to lock in the decline from the January 19 peak as a corrective pattern. However, even if a rally through 1104-1105 were to occur, we do not believe that would change the big picture.
On the downside, our main focus is on tactical support at 1029-1020. Since last week’s low was a minimum 38.2% retrace of the July-January rally and since we do not think that last week’s low was the low, it seems reasonable to expect the S&P to take the next step and retrace at least 50% of the July-January rally. That would imply further weakness toward 1010. That would be more than enough to decisively violate tactical support and lock in the entire rally from March’s low as a complete pattern.
R&R
We will be hosting a webinar/conference call later this month. It would be about an hour and will include both charts and Q&A. The cost will be $30 and there are still some spots available. Please send expressions of serious interest (with no commitment) to walter@wminsights.com.
On Tuesday, the S&P 500 more than made up for Monday’s 0.9% setback with a rally of 1.3%. Internally, breadth was positive by 11:2 and the up/down volume ratio was positive by almost 5:1. Tuesday’s rally was bolstered by a 23% increase in total volume. Finally, the daily Coppock Curve has a bullish bias for 16 of the 24 S&P industry groups; this indicates that a near term bottom is in place.
S&P 1500 BPI and A-D Line
The improving nature of the daily Coppock Curve, together with the current oversold condition suggests that the S&P needs some R&R (rest and relaxation), which suggests the potential for further upside. However, the intermediate trends are still under pressure. The post-January downtrend still has an impulsive look to it (subject to the S&P’s ability to hold below 1104-1105), the weekly Coppock oscillator is likely to have a bearish bias through most – if not all – of March, the Bullish Percentage Index (BPI) is well below its 21-day ma, and almost two-thirds of the stocks in the S&P 1500 Supercomposite are at least 10% below their respective 52-week high (and almost one-quarter are at least 20% below their 52-week high). All of this suggests that the intermediate downtrend will be able to withstand the impact of a near term rally. Thus, we expect that, once any near term strength runs its course, the intermediate pressures will reassert themselves and carry the indexes to new reaction lows.
Our resistance focus in the period immediately ahead is on 1104-1105. A rally through that benchmark would do much to lock in the decline from the January 19 peak as a corrective pattern. However, even if a rally through 1104-1105 were to occur, we do not believe that would change the big picture. We continue to believe that a challenge of the January high would result in more numerous and more important negative divergences than those that already exist. It would be a condition not unlike the divergences that appeared in October 2007 as the market penetrated the July 2007 high.
On the downside, our main focus is on tactical support at 1029-1020. Since last week’s low was a minimum 38.2% retrace of the July-January rally and since we do not think that last week’s low was the low, it seems reasonable to expect the S&P to take the next step and retrace at least 50% of the July-January rally. That would imply further weakness toward 1010. That would be more than enough to decisively violate tactical support and lock in the entire rally from March’s low as a complete pattern.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Short Term Review
Below is the "Plain English" summary from the first page of the report.
Stocks: Our main focus is on tactical support at 1029-1020. Since last week’s low was a minimum objective and since we do not think that last week’s low was the low, it seems reasonable to expect the S&P to take the next step and retrace at least 50% of the July-January rally. That would imply further weakness toward 1010. That would be more than enough to decisively violate tactical support and lock in the entire rally from March’s low as a complete pattern.
10-Year Yields: In previous comments we had mentioned that the decline in 10-year yields since late December had locked in the November-December rally as a complete pattern that. Continued weakness has upped the ante a bit because we can now say that the larger rally that began in October has been reversed.
US Dollar: Given its weighting in the dollar index, it is not surprising that our outlook for the euro is essentially the opposite of that for the dollar. Virtually everything that is bullish for the greenback is negative for the euro. If, anything, the euro’s weakness is more apparent than the dollar’s strength. We say that because the euro has retraced almost 61.8% of its March-November decline, the dollar index has only retraced a bit more than 38.2% of its March-November rally.
Commodities: Oil is now in a confirmed downtrend. The decline from January’s high is impulsive and is deep enough to lock in the December-January rally as a complete pattern. While the uptrend from the December 2008 low just above 31 is still intact, oil is now in the middle of the key 73-69 support range
Friday, February 5, 2010
The Cork’s Out of the Bottle
We are considering hosting a webinar/conference call later this month. It would be about an hour, would be limited to 30 participants (with priority to subscribers), and would include both charts and Q&A. The cost would likely be in the $30 area. Please send expressions of serious interest (with no commitment) to walter@wminsights.com.
On Thursday, the S&P 500 had its toughest day since April with a loss of 3.1%. Internally, breadth was negative by better than 24:1 and the up/down volume ratio was negative by 32:1. To top it off, total volume increased by 37%. The daily Coppock Curve is still negative for 22 of the 24 S&P industry groups. To call Thursday a distribution day or a 9:1 day does not do it justice. The cork is out of the bottle.
S&P 500 Hourly
In addition to the internals described above, Thursday’s decline occurred on five waves on the hourly chart. Indeed, we will have to see how the S&P handles the fifth wave in that sequence, because it could turn out to be a lower degree third wave (i.e., a third of a third). Regardless, the move to new lows in an impulsive fashion suggests that the index has begun a second leg from the January high.
At this point it is largely irrelevant as to whether we call this second downleg a “C” wave or a third wave. Either way it should be at least equal to the decline from January’s high into last week’s low. Indeed, since third waves and “C” waves both tend to be fairly powerful, we should not be surprised if this new decline is 1.618 times the earlier first or “A” wave.
On the daily chart, equality suggests an objective of 1044; the 1.618 multiple implies a test of 1030. Readers may find those numbers intriguing. In earlier posts we said that we expected a move to at least 1043 (i.e., a 38.2% retrace of the July-January rally) and, if that level was exceeded, the door would then be open for a challenge of tactical support at 1029-1020. (For what it is worth, the objectives derived from the daily chart are a bit more conservative than those derived from the hourly chart.)
As for resistance, the rally to 1105 earlier this week provides a new reference point. An immediate rally back through that level would lock in the entire decline from the January high as a corrective pattern. However, if yesterday’s decline is the first leg of a larger pattern, which appears likely, then nearby oversold rally attempts may not make it past 1079-1089.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Near Term Improvement, But …
We are considering hosting a webinar/conference call later this month. It would be about an hour, would be limited to 30 participants (with priority to subscribers), and would include both charts and Q&A. The cost would likely be in the $30 area. Please send expressions of serious interest (with no commitment) to walter@wminsights.com.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 fell 0.6%. Breadth was negative by a 5:2 margin and down volume exceeded up volume by almost 3:1. However, total volume fell by almost 11% from Tuesday’s level.
S&P 500 with Daily Coppock Curve
The daily Coppock Curve still has a bearish bias for 19 of the 24 S&P industry groups, but these pressures may not last much longer. By our reckoning a solid majority of the groups could take on a bullish Coppock bias by as early as Thursday (tomorrow). As such, we would not be surprised if those new constructive underpinnings persisted for 2-3 weeks (which is pretty typical for a near term trend). However, the weekly oscillators are firmly entrenched in downtrends and appear able to withstand any near term strength. As such, the risk is that near term surprises will be to the downside.
That said, we are still in the camp that the decline from the January 19 high is impulsive on the hourly chart. So, while the daily chart does have a corrective hue to it, we are inclined to count the choppiness toward the end of the last week as an “irregular” bottom. In “Plain English” that simply means that the actual low last Friday is part of a corrective process that actually began a few days earlier. Subscribers will note that we used a similar formation in the recent monthly Insights when comparing the November 2008 low to the March 2009 bottom.
Despite this week’s rally, the “500” has barely managed to struggle to first resistance. In Monday’s post we noted that this countertrend rally should be a Fibonacci relationship to the just completed decline. A 38.2% retracement is in line with the fourth wave of prior degree, so 1102-1103 is a reasonably important first resistance area; the S&P rallied to 1105 before pulling back. Second resistance is in the 1111-1120 area. Obviously, a rally back through 1150 would send us back to our pencil and ruler.
We continue to believe that the decline from January’s high will be at least a 38.2% retracement of the July-January rally. This suggests further weakness to 1043, intervening rallies notwithstanding. Such a move could well put tactical support at 1029-1020 under pressure.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
February's Monthly
Below, is our Plain English summary from the first page of the monthly. The charts are worthwhile!!
Stocks: We can say with confidence that the rally from the July lows has been reversed. Thus, our immediate focus will be on chart and Fibonacci support levels related to the July-January advance. But as the new downtrend develops, and especially if it begins to move below 1043, we will begin to focus more on tactical support and the potential for a confirmed resumption of the primary bear trend.
10-Year Yields: A breach of 3.175%-3.201% would invalidate three bullish formations and set the stage for still lower yields. Thus, we view that range as tactical support.
US Dollar: Conventional wisdom is that expectations toward the dollar are responsible for the movements in commodities. Our take is that the dollar is but one player in a broad-based cyclical change in trends.
Commodities: The Continuous Commodity Index had a five wave decline in 2008, followed by a counter-trend 61.8% retracement rally. This combination suggests that the CCI is positioned to test its 2008 low. To put that into perspective, the index is currently at 465; the 2008 low was 322. However, there are still a few missing ingredients for such a decline.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Countertrend Rally
February’s monthly Insights should be released Tuesday (Wednesday at the latest). Readers interested in becoming a subscriber should send an e-mail to either walter@wminsights.com or customerservice@wminsights.com.
We are considering hosting a webinar/conference call later this month. It would be about an hour, would be limited to 30 participants (with priority to subscribers), and would include both charts and Q&A. The cost would likely be in the $30 area. Please send expressions of serious interest (with no commitment) to walter@wminsights.com.
S&P Hourly
On Monday, the S&P 500 had its best day since the first trading session of the year with a rally of 1.4%. Breadth was positive by 9:2 and up volume outpaced down volume by a 17:2 ratio. However, total volume fell by over 27% from Friday’s level.
The lower volume, which puts a bit of a damper on Monday, continues January’s propensity for lower volume on rallies and higher volume on declines. During January, the S&P rallied 11 times and fell eight times. Volume was lower for seven of the 11 rally days, while seven of the eight down days were accompanied by higher volume. Thus, despite the strong start to the year, the overall bias has been to distribution, not accumulation.
That said, near term momentum is oversold and there has been evidence of positive divergences. For example, the daily Coppock Curve is still weak for 21 of the 24 S&P industry groups, but this compares with 22 late last week and all 24 early last week. Moreover, it is our expectation that a majority of the groups will have a bullish near term momentum bias by the end of this week.
This combination of oversold and diverging momentum suggests that Monday’s rally could continue for a while, perhaps for much of February. The oversold 10-day CBOE put/call ratio buttresses the idea of further near term strength. However, we continue to count January’s decline as a five-wave pattern, meaning that it is the first leg of a larger decline. Moreover, the intermediate indicators are weak enough that they should be able to withstand a near term rally. Thus, the risk is that surprises are more likely to be to the downside.
Our basic view is that Monday’s rally is part of a wave 2 or a wave “B” within a larger unfinished downtrend. As such, this countertrend rally should be a Fibonacci relationship to the just completes wave 1/A. There are several ways to count the five wave pattern, but a 38.2% retracement is in line with the fourth wave of prior degree, so 1102-1103 is a reasonably important first resistance area. Beyond that we would look to 1111-1120.
We continue to believe that the decline from January’s high will be at least a 38.2% retracement of the July-January rally. This suggests further weakness to 1043, intervening rallies notwithstanding. Such a move could well put tactical support at 1029-1020 under pressure.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
A Linear Downtrend
We are now on Twitter as waltergmurphy. We will make brief posts when conditions warrant.
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber to our Insights and Short Term Review reports should send an e-mail to either walter@wminsights.com or customerservice@wminsights.com.
On Thursday, the S&P 500 fell 1.2%. Breadth was negative by 9:2 and the up/down volume ratio was in the red by a bit less than 2:1. Total volume increased by 3%. The daily Coppock Curve is negative for 22 of the 24 S&P industry groups and is positioned to remain negative for a majority of the groups for another week or so.
In our last post, we thought that the hourly chart had enough divergences to suggest that a five wave decline was complete and that the S&P had the potential to have a “bounce in its step” in coming days. Thus, Thursday’s decline to lower reaction lows complicates things a bit.
S&P 500
The inability of the hourly RSI to cross above the neutral “50” line (or the hourly Coppock Curve to cross above the neutral “zero” line) suggests that the downtrend from the January 19 high is a trending or linear pattern. Thus, the short term bias will remain down until the “500” crosses through the resistance downtrend line and/or the hourly momentum indicators cross above their respective neutral lines.
Meanwhile, Thursday’s action may have taken away some of the impulsive qualities of this decline. Or maybe it didn’t. We say that because the last three days show some overlaps on the daily chart. There are several counts that can account for this. The pattern could be moving toward the corrective end of the scale or it could be on the verge of a “3 of 3” downside acceleration. And there is evidence for both sides of that question and the impulsive quality of the decline is still very much in play. That said, we will let the market clarify things in coming days.
Regardless, the damage is done and, as mentioned in yesterday’s post, the second domino has fallen and the rally from at least the July low is complete.
The third domino is 1029-1020. That level represents the lows of the aforementioned October-November correction. A breach of that range, which we have used as tactical support, would confirm the completion of the post-March bear market rally. That range also lies between 1043-1010, which represents a 38.2%-50% retracement of the July-January rally. Therefore, it is not a stretch to suggest that tactical support is now first support.
First resistance is 1103. That level is both chart resistance on the hourly chart and can be counted as the second wave of prior degree. Second resistance is 1114-1115, which represents the recent breakdown point as well as a 38.2% retracement of the decline from January’s high.
The Second Domino Falls
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber to our Insights and Short Term Review reports should send an e-mail to either walter@wminsights.com or customerservice@wminsights.com.
On Monday, the S&P 500 rallied 0.5%. Breadth was positive by a 4:3 margin and up volume outpaced down volume by a 3:2 ratio. For a change, total volume increased (by 12%) on an up day. However, the daily Coppock Curve is still negative for 22 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
From our perspective, it is not terribly significant that Wednesday was an up day. The more important feature was that, during the day, the S&P broke below 1086-1085. We have referred to that support zone as the second domino in a potentially significant decline. So, although the breach was temporary, it did occur.
S&P 500 Daily
What is the significance? At a minimum, it locks in the rally from July’s low (at 869) as a complete pattern. Thus, we will expect to see at least a 38.2% retracement of the July-January rally. However, since momentum remains weak, it is quite possible that we will see more than that minimum expectation.
That said, we have been counting the October-November correction as being as important as July’s pullback. If that is correct, then we will respect the possibility that Wednesday’s break of 1086-1085 actually marked the end of the bear market rally from last March’s low (667). That, in turn, would mean that Fibonacci relationships should be applied to the entire March-January pattern. More importantly, a reversal of the post-March pattern would imply that the downtrend from the 2007 high is about to reassert itself.
Meanwhile, yesterday’s low can be counted as the completion of a five wave decline on the hourly chart. We say “completion” because those lows were not confirmed by either the hourly Coppock Curve or the hourly MACD. Thus, it would seem that the S&P may have some bounce in its step in the next few days. But our wave count, together with non-Elliott considerations (such as volume, momentum, sentiment, and trend), suggests that a nearby rally will not be sustainable and that lower lows will follow.
The third domino is 1029-1020. That level represents the lows of the aforementioned October-November correction. A breach of that range, which we have used as tactical support, would confirm the completion of the post-March bear market rally. That range also lies between 1043-1010, which represents a 38.2%-50% retracement of the July-January rally. Therefore, it is not a stretch to suggest that tactical support is now first support.
First resistance is 1103. That level is both chart resistance on the hourly chart and can be counted as the second wave of prior degree. Second resistance is 1114-1115, which represents the recent breakdown point as well as a 38.2% retracement of the decline from January’s high.
Monday, January 25, 2010
A Bad Oversold Condition
We will be in Bethesda for the next couple of days, so there will definitely not be a blog on Tuesday night and perhaps not on Wednesday night either.
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber to our Insights and Short Term Review reports should send an e-mail to either walter@wminsights.com or customerservice@wminsights.com.
On Monday, the S&P 500 broke a three-day losing streak with a rally of 0.5%. Breadth was positive by a bit better than 3:2 and up volume outpaced down volume by a 5:4 margin. However, the internals were not entirely positive. The overall action resulted in an inside day (a lower high and higher low than Friday’s action) and total volume fell by 28%. Moreover, the daily Coppock Curve is negative for every one of the 24 S&P industry groups.
S&P 500 Hourly
Last week’s decline resulted in a “bad oversold” condition. This is a confirming situation that typically results in a rally (that helps to work off the oversold reading), followed by renewed weakness that establishes one or more lower lows. As those lows occur, we begin to look for positive divergence.
As an example of the confirming bad oversold condition, Friday’s 5.1% three-day rate of change was the lowest since March (which was a positive divergence when compared to October and November 2008). Similarly, the hourly Coppock Curve reached its lowest reading since October (that’s a lot of hours).
At the same time, we can make a case that the DJIA has now achieved five waves down from last week’s high. We have to use a fifth wave “failure” to achieve that count, but it is certainly doable. Last week, we could not say that for the DJIA. Last week we could (did and do) count five waves down on the S&P, but not for the DJIA. So the DJIA has now caught up with the S&P in that regard.
That said, there is some chatter that the five wave pattern is a “C” wave. But the breach of support, increased down volume, weak momentum, and trend line breaks suggests that the decline is the beginning of something, not the end.
Next support exists at 1086-1085. In turn, a break of that range would, at a minimum, lock in the rally from the July low (and probably the March low) as a complete pattern.
As for resistance, 1105-1116 is the fourth wave of prior degree within the five-wave decline from last week’s highs; this is a typical resistance area. (Monday’s high was 1103.) Second resistance is the 1133-1136 breakdown point from the 1150 bear market rally high.
Short Term Review
Stocks: We think there is a strong case to be made that last Monday’s high could prove to be the peak for the year. At the least, the current evidence suggests that it should be one of the three or four most important inflection points of 2010.
10-Year Yields: We will have to be alert to the possibility that yields will ultimately be positioned for a test of the October-November double bottom at 3.175%.
US Dollar: The dollar’s pattern from its November 2008 high is a corrective structure, which means that the rally leading into that high should prove to be the first leg of a larger uptrend. If so, then the upside potential in the months ahead should significantly outweigh the downside risk, even allowing for a test of the recent lows.
Commodities: Any further pressures are likely to carry gold to new reaction lows that, in turn, would translate into a confirmed downtrend. The weight of the evidence favors lower lows for oil over the near to medium term.
For the full analysis, please visit the website for subscription information.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Potentially a Lot Further to Go
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber to our Insights and Short Term Review reports should send an e-mail to either walter@wminsights.com or customerservice@wminsights.com.
On Thursday, the S&P 500 suffered its sharpest decline since late October with a loss of 1.9%. Breadth was negative by better than 6:1 and up/down volume was in the red by almost 7:1. Perhaps most importantly, total volume surged by 43%. The daily Coppock Curve is negative for 22 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
Over the past nine sessions there have been five up days and four down days. All five rally days occurred on lower volume, while each of the four setbacks was accompanied by higher turnover. So, distribution has clearly been evident over the past two weeks. That came home to roost on Thursday as the sharp decline was part of what is now a five-wave downleg. Moreover, the index has now violated every uptrend line of note beginning from the March lows. It would seem, therefore, that this new downtrend has further to go. Potentially a lot further to go. It is possible that the minimum requirements for a complete “bull market” pattern from March’s low have been satisfied.
S&P 500
That said, two days do not necessarily make a trend. Indeed, while the S&P has accelerated down from Wednesday’s high, it has stalled a bit in the 1118-1111 area. Readers may recall that in yesterday’s post we pointed to that range as both Fibonacci support and potentially strong chart support. Thus, a breach of that range would likely signal further weakness toward the December low itself at 1086-1085. In turn, a break of that range would, at a minimum, lock in the rally from the July low (and possible the March low) as a complete pattern.
With that in mind (and as mentioned above), the decline from Wednesday’s low has a distinct five wave look to it. Given the other evidence (volume, momentum, and trend line breaks), it seems very likely that this five wave pattern will prove to be the first leg of a larger downtrend.
Given the breakdown of recent days, the 1131-1150 top formation is now important resistance. A rally through that range would a) be a surprise and b) place the S&P in position to challenge what is still important resistance near 1158.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
A Domino Falls
Readers interested in becoming a subscriber to our Insights and Short Term Review reports should send an e-mail to either walter@wminsights.com or customerservice@wminsights.com.
On Wednesday, the S&P 500 fell 1.1%. Breadth was negative by 11:2, which is the most negative margin since late November. Up/down volume was also negative, but by a more modest 10:3 ratio. However, volume increased by 3%. The daily Coppock Curve is negative for 20 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
The S&P 500 declined by over 1% in two of the past three days and gained 1% on the other. Volume increased on the two down days but fell off on the up day. All of this suggests a bout of distribution.
The index broke below 1130 on Thursday. This effectively locked in the rally from the December 9 low as a complete pattern. Since that rally can be counted as the “C” wave of an ABC uptrend from the November 2 low, it is therefore possible to count the November-January pattern as having ended. And, since we have been treating the post-November structure as the final leg (i.e., the “E” wave) from the March lows, it is now possible to suggest that the minimum requirements for a complete “bull market” pattern have been satisfied. In recent comments, we have described this as a potential domino effect. If this proves to be correct, then the risk is that Thursday’s relatively modest setback will have an impact on increasingly larger wave degrees.
S&P 500
That said, the S&P still has a lot of work ahead of it to knock over the next domino, which requires a break below the December low itself at 1086-1085. Such a break would, at a minimum, lock in the rally from the July low (and possible the March low) as a complete pattern. Since 1086-1085 is not even close to a 38.2% retracement of the post-July rally, a breach of that range would likely imply importantly lower lows.
All that said, it is possible to count the range of recent days as a triangle. If so, then the S&P may still have a final last gasp rally left in it. But given the toppled domino, as well as the momentum and sentiment concerns mentioned in recent comments, the upside potential is likely a fraction of the downside risk. As mentioned in the recent STR, this is not the time to be committing new funds to the equity market.
With the rally from December 9 now complete, Fibonacci support is indicated in the 1126-1111 range. The 1118-1111 range also includes potentially strong chart support. A violation of these levels will open the door for a move to 1086-1085.
There is now a triple top at 1150, so a breakout through 1150 would allow for further strength toward 1158. As mentioned in many past comments, the 1121-1158 range involves a number of important Fibonacci relationships. As a result, a breakout through that range would be, almost by definition, a bullish development.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Mr. Market Knows Best
The New Year has had 11 trading days and the S&P 500 has been up for nine of them. On Tuesday, the index gained 1.3%. Some of the market mavens attributed this strength to the election in Massachusetts. Go figure. Regardless, both breadth and up/down volume were positive by about a 5:1 margin. However, total volume fell 4%. The daily Coppock Curve is positive for 14 of the 24 S&P industry groups.
In recent comments, we have gone to some length to describe a potential domino effect. Our thought has been – and still is – that even a modest setback could have an impact on increasingly larger wave degrees. Indeed, in our recent Short Term Review, we suggested that a decline back below last Friday’s low could set those pressures in motion. It seems that the market sensed the proximity of an important support level as it opened strongly on Tuesday and never looked back.
S&P 500 Hourly
Now, with the index once again probing the 1150 area, we have to keep an eye on 1158. As mentioned in many past comments, the 1121-1158 range involves a number of important Fibonacci relationships. As a result, a breakout through that range would be, almost by definition, a bullish development.
Thus, the index has two potentially significant reference points: support at 1131 and resistance up to 1158. Arguably, the 27-point interval between those two points is something of a no man’s land. Frankly, our thought was that momentum, sentiment, and our wave count were strong enough to indicate an imminent breach of support. But, at least on Tuesday, the market seemed to have other ideas.
All that said, a decline through 1132-1131 during the balance of this week will effectively lock in the rally from December 9 as a complete pattern. Until that happens, we will continue to give the current trend the benefit of the doubt. Second support remains at 1086-1085.
A rally decisively through 1158 would do much to open the door for a move through 1200.